Lament as Response to Suffering: Part 3

                                                                                                Psalm 38:3-8

Previously we saw that YHWH was the source of David’s affliction.  David cried to YHWH not to chasten him in divine anger and wrath.  David understands YHWH’s discipline is part of their relationship.  It is therefore rational that David would look to YHWH to remove this suffering.  Verses 3-8 teach us the nature, ultimate cause and David’s response to affliction.

David stands before YHWH

Having called upon YHWH’s name and announcing a plea, David now is standing before YHWH his king.  David must now make his case.  As a king, David understood this situation.  How many times had his subjects come before him as judge?  As king, David had great power and authority.  Now David is in the dock before someone who has absolute power and authority.

For we know him who said, “Vengeance is mine; I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge his people.” It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Hebrews 10:30–31).

Isaiah writes:

       The sinners in Zion are afraid;

trembling has seized the godless:

       “Who among us can dwell with the consuming fire?

Who among us can dwell with everlasting burnings?”

                                                                                                            Isaiah 33:14

David knows his position.  He is standing naked before YHWH his judge.  The effulgence of God’s Glory is at once beyond beauty and very dangerous.  YHWH is “a consuming fire” (Deut. 4:24; 9:3; Heb. 12:29).  Therefore, who can stand before him and not be destroyed?  As YHWH told Moses when he asked to see His Glory: “you cannot see my face, for man shall not see me and live” (Ex. 33:20).  Only the pure and spotless can stand before God.  David and Moses were far from perfect and both had blood on their hands.  Indeed, no man who ever lived or will live meets this absolute perfect standard save one: Jesus.

David knew YHWH.  He understood that the Lord’s justice demands that all sin must be punished. God cannot abide anything that falls short of His moral perfection.  This includes our tainted and corrupt image which once was a pure reflection of our Creator.  If God does not uphold his justice, then he will cease to be Himself.  As God is just, such a fracture means the very failure of justice everywhere.  God cannot change.  “Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever” (Heb. 13:8). There must be a penalty “for the wages of sin is death” (Ro. 6:23).

Sin brings forth the anger and wrath of God.  God’s wrath is not an uncontrolled emotional reaction but “describes the settled opposition of God’s nature against evil, His holy displeasure against sinners, and the punishment He justly metes out to them on account of their sins.”^[1] God’s wrath is not be understood in psychological terms but in ontological[2] terms.  God is never the subject acted upon but the object which acts upon all else.  Although Scripture speaks anthropomorphically[3] about God’s anger “being provoked,” what is happening is God acting according to his very being by strongly opposing and punishing sin.  God must do this because it is who God is.  God’s actions reflect his being.

Yet David also knows that God is kind, loving, merciful and gracious.  This was revealed to Moses in the divine name YHWH: “The LORD passed before him and proclaimed, ‘The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, but who will by no means clear the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children and the children’s children, to the third and the fourth generation’” (Exodus 34:6–7).

These attributes or “perfections” of God seem in conflict.  Must God choose his justice over his mercy or his wrath over his love?  Or does God somehow resolve these conflicts by some wise compromise?  It is neither.  God being infinite and pure spirit necessitates he is not made of any parts.  Therefore, God is not part justice and part mercy.  Each perfection of God is part of a simple whole that cannot be separated.  We, as limited creatures must compartmentalize and distinguish them in order to come to some understanding, albeit imperfect. 

These attributes are conceived to exist in “perichoresis”[4] which is a mutual indwelling.  The concept is trinitarian.  God is of one essence and three persons.  God is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.  The Holy Spirit is fully God, the Son is fully God and the Father is fully God.  They exist and live within each other, not separate in anyway, but distinct.  We know each member of the Trinity through their revelation recorded in scripture.  Likewise, we come to know God’s Being through what God does.  God’s justice is revealed as him judging, His wrath as punishing, His mercy as forgiveness, His kindness as long-suffering, and His love as Jesus Christ by who’s self-sacrifice God is also gracious.

David knows God to be righteous.  Righteousness is manifest in God’s works of salvation both in His covenantal love for Israel and in Christ, Jesus.  God chose, loved, delivered and protected Israel.  However, the pinnacle of God’s righteousness is found in John 3:16: “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.”  When Israel appealed to God’s righteousness, they were calling upon Him to act according to His covenantal promises and intervene.  Jesus’ Hebrew name, Joshua (יְהוֹשֻׁ֙עַ֙, Je-ho-shu-a) is derived from the root יהוה (YHWH).  It means “Ya saves” or “God saves.” 

The name of God, that of Jesus, is grounded in God’s righteous acts of salvation.  To call upon that name is to call upon our God who has promised to save us.  By calling upon that name, David immediately calls upon YHWH in this holy relationship of mutual love and responsibilities.  Therefore, we stand not before a capricious, fickle or self-centered God who we hope to impress or appease, but before our loving father who is committed to us in covenant.  When God “cut” this covenant with Abram he appeared as a fire pot and passed between animals who were cut in two (Genesis 15).  He was effectively saying to Abram “if I break this covenant let it be done to me what has been done to these animals.”  God is immortal.  It can’t happen.  Therefore, God’s promises are certain.  As Abraham’s spiritual descendants, we have inherited this covenant and its promises.

God’s Holiness expresses the unity of his moral perfections in what He does: God’s acts.  David stands naked before the Lord’s Holiness and is experiencing chastisement.  Yet as he knows YHWH and understands that there is salvation in this, and he shall seek it as a son and as covenantal promise.  Let us explore how David accomplishes this.

The cause of David’s suffering is sin (v. 3-4).

David immediately accepts and affirms that his suffering is due to his sin.  This is the essential next step and we should make note of it. Verse 3 is an example of parallelism.  There are four lines divided into two bicola.[5]  In this case the second line explains the cause of the affliction described in the first line.  Two bicola are used to amplify and expand upon what David is saying.  Here YHWH’s indignation and David’s sin are linked together.  Indignation is YHWH’s expected response to sin.  The result is “no soundness” and “no health.”  David is emphatically admitting that YHWH is afflicting him because of sin.

David’s sin is not merely his “original sin” of being a child of Adam.  In verse 4, David is speaking of actual sins he committed.  We know that David was an adulterer who murdered Bathsheba’s husband Uriah.  How many other sins did this man, invested by YHWH with power and authority over Israel, commit?  They are enough to ‘pile over” David’s head and press down and upon him.  David must carry these sins which are likened to flood waters engulfing him and a weight crushing him. 

John Calvin compares David’s statement in verse 4 to Cain’s statement to God in Genesis 4: “My punishment is greater than I can bear.”  Calvin points out that unlike David, Cain is quarreling with God.  David first acknowledges his sin as the heavy weight whereas Cain, the refers to the punishment as that weight.  Cain is petitioning for a change in sentence and protection.  God is merciful to Cain by not taking his life for murdering Abel, but Cain departs from God’s presence unredeemed.  There was no contrition, confession and request for forgiveness. 

David, on the other hand, is under heavy conviction of sin.  Such is a great burden for one understands the harm done to others and realizes that all sin is against God.  Sin distances us from God and we feel alone.  The burden of this distancing, God hiding his “face” from us, is heard in Jesus’ cry from the cross: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”  (Mark 15:34, Ps 22:1).  God never truly forsakes David, but it seems that way when He hides his “face.” 

Cain walked away from Eden, to the East where the godless will live outside of God’s “presence.”  David seeks and will find restoration of his relationship with God.  Therefore, the godly seek the Lord not merely for temporal or material purposes but for restoration of communion that has been disrupted by sin. 

David’s suffering is physical as well as spiritual (v. 5 and 7)

Verses 5-8 form a structural unit known as a chiasm[6].  You will notice that verses 5 and 7 are similar in that they describe the nature of the ailment.  Verses 6 and 8 describe the suffering that the ailment causes.  Each verse consists of a bicolon, employing parallelism.  The arrangements of the four bicola serve to greatly expand and build upon each other giving a fuller sense than a simple statement of fact.  The chiastic arrangement is A-B-A′-B′.  Verses 5 and 7 are A and A′ respectively.

We see here that David’s affliction is physical.  He describes “wounds” that are putrid and “festering.”  They were caused by his “foolishness” which here is another word for sin.  In this way verse 5 is linked to verse 3.  David is also in great pain.  Burning pain is constant and gnawing.  One cannot find relief from it. Nothing seems to quench it.  Perhaps it points to the eternal “burning” of hell.  My patients have described this form of pain as a misery indicating emotional suffering such as hopelessness.  He repeats “there is no soundness in my flesh” linking verse 7 to verse 3. 

David has expanded upon and provided a poetic technique to invite God (and the reader) to experience his affliction.  He does this also in verses 6 and 8.  Why does David need to press upon YHWH this “experience?”  Is not YHWH all knowing and all wise?  Surely, as the one afflicting David, YHWH understands fully what David is experiencing.  Yet David is appealing to God because he knows YHWH has more than mere factual knowledge of pain and suffering. 

David’s son, the Messiah, will be God-incarnate and experience firsthand, hunger, thirst, pain, sadness and even death.  He will weep for a friend, have compassion on those suffering and identify with us in every way as fully human.  He will take all our sin upon himself and be whipped such that his flesh was exposed and his wounds would come to stink and fester.  The Hebrew word translated “sides” means the loins.  This is a place where the whip often fell.  Under Roman practice rocks and other hard material was wound into the cords so they cut and tore flesh, exposing inner organs such as the kidneys.  We can only imagine the unquenching burning pain.  Jesus’ flesh became unsound.  The indignation and wrath of God fell upon him for our sake. 

Although such affliction points to Jesus’ suffering we are not to conclude that David is simply prophesizing.  It is David who is ill, who has festering wounds that burn and cause misery.  It is David who has sinned, and it is David who is experiencing God’s chastisement for sin.  The connection to Christ is logical because such suffering under discipline is a foreshadow and small taste of what Jesus would experience.  Whereas David’s affliction was corrective in nature, Jesus affliction was penal.  David could expect relief from God whereas Jesus suffered divine dereliction and “descended into Hell” for us.  David was guilty.  Jesus was innocent.  The resurrection of Christ was public vindication of his innocence and victory over Satan and death.  Our vindication and victory are not our own but ours in Christ, as we have a share in it. 

David responds with humility, shame and remorse

(v. 6 and 8)

Verses 6 and 8 describe the emotional and spiritual effect of David’s affliction.  They also describe David’s response.  David is “utterly bowed down and prostrate.”  This is a position of great humbleness.  David, the king, does not stoically sit upon his throne before God as an equal.  Nor does David claim his position, authority and accomplishments as evidence before God.  David does not gnash his teeth in defiant anger as the ones Jesus describes as being cast out of the Kingdom.  David does not demand anything, nor does he bargain. 

David simply casts himself before his Lord and Father continually mourning his sin.  David is contrite and remorseful.  This contrition differs from superficial attrition.  Attrition describes someone who is worn down and beaten by external pressure.  Contrition comes from the heart and not from the external circumstances.  Yea, God often uses the external circumstances to get our attention, but contrition can happen when all seems well.  David understands the depth of his sin and the height of He who was sinned against.  The contrite heart grieves because of the sin whereas attrition brings grief because of the adverse consequences of the sin.  “All day” describes the continual and unceasing mourning and prostration before YHWH.  It is emotional, spiritual as well as physical. 

Verse 8 amplifies and further explains verse 6.  Both verses are linked to verse 4 by use of the terms bowed down, feeble, and crushed.  The second part of verse 8 explains why David is groaning in pain.  It is not simply from the wounds but from the “tumult of my heart.”  In the Biblical world the heart is not the seat of emotions.  The bowels (kidneys, inner organs) were believed to be the seat of emotion.  The heart is the seat of the soul and is therefore used to describe the immaterial aspect of our human life, our soul, that also suffers when we do.  David is both physically sick and “sin sick.”  The Hebrew word translated as “tumult’ signifies a “roaring.”  It is not a mere disquiet but a raging storm exploding from within affecting both mind and body.  We read elsewhere that “David’s heart struck him after he had numbered the people. And David said to the Lord, ‘I have sinned greatly in what I have done.’” 2 Sa 24:10

The connection between sin, affliction, and suffering is total.  David confesses this before the Lord and his suffering is no mere show. 

Lessons for us

David has been described as a man after God’s own heart (1 Sam 3:14; Acts 13:22).  How can this be since David was an adulterer and murderer?  When David’s sin with Bathsheba was exposed by God through the prophet Nathan, David wrote:

      The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit;

                                    a broken and contrite heart, O God, you will not despise.

Ps 51:17

This is David’s expression of confidence in God’s promise to deliver him from sin and forgive him.  It comes after contrite confession, praise and petition.  David brings nothing of his own before YHWH save his own sin and brokenness.

We are to do likewise.  God does not require of us sacrifices of bulls and goats, performance of great deeds much less acts of penance or other material gift.  God desires restoration of relationship and to that end we must recognize and own our transgressions, acknowledge God as our discipling but loving Father and come before him bringing our shame and grief.

The Christian’s heart is not one of stone but of flesh.  It is circumcised and consecrated to God.  That “heart” is our “soul,” our eternal essence that has intimate communion with God or joins with Satan and the mockers.  A man after God’s own heart seeks God’s heart – soul seeking soul, spirit seeking spirit.  As we are in Christ, we have a participation in the Triune Godhead through Christ – that most intimate circumincession inaccessible save in Christ. 

This seems so simple.  So why is it hard to do?  I confess that I sorely struggle with it as I am sure many of you do.  Our pride is puffed up by Satan who tells us we should not humble and prostrate ourselves before our Lord.  We deny, minimalize or simply fail to understand and feel the depth of our sin and its consequences.  We presume upon God’s grace rather than rest in it. In this we compound our guilt.

Once we understand that everything we have comes from God, we see that even our regeneration, conviction of sin and our faith are gifts of grace.  Before we can be like David, God must remove the old heart of stone and give us one after His own.  But until our final perfection in the resurrection of our bodies, we live in tents of fragile flesh and are far from perfect.  God is working with us, growing us and preparing us to be “meet for heaven.”  This is a process of sanctification that punctuates our lives.  We can fight it in pride and arrogance or embrace it with humility.

Oh Lord, please grant me a humble heart that I may see my sin, grieve my sin, abhor my sin and bring it to you in contrite confession.  Give me this gift though I do not deserve it.  For I am nothing and can do nothing without you; even this, my pride and arrogance, cannot be purged without you.  Make me like the publican, who beat his breast and with head held low and cried out for forgiveness.  Take me as I am, a poor and broken sinner, wash me with hyssop and clothe me with your son’s righteousness lest I be lost forever.  Let thy countenance shine upon me.  Do this for your Name’s sake and for your Son, Jesus Christ.  Amen.

---

^[1] Alan Cairns, Dictionary of Theological Terms (Belfast; Greenville, SC: Ambassador Emerald International, 2002), 529.

[2] relating to the branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being.

[3] Describing certain aspects of God having human characteristics – it is analogy for our understanding.

[4] More commonly known as circumincession: “The theological concept, also referred to as perichoresis, affirming that the divine essence is shared by each of the three persons of the Trinity in a manner that avoids blurring the distinctions among them. By extension, this idea suggests that any essential characteristic that belongs to one of the three is shared by the others. Circumincession also affirms that the action of one of the persons of the Trinity is also fully the action of the other two persons.”  Stanley Grenz, David Guretzki, and Cherith Fee Nordling, Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999), 26.

[5] A verse structure of poetry having two cola (lines) that are related thematically and rhythmically. pl. bicola.  Todd J. Murphy, Pocket Dictionary for the Study of Biblical Hebrew, The IVP Pocket Reference Series (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2003), 35.

[6] A literary structure where parallel elements correspond in an inverted order (i.e., A-B-C-Cʹ-Bʹ-Aʹ).  Douglas Mangum, The Lexham Glossary of Theology (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2014).